Playback speed
Share post
Share post at current time


Gensler vs Peirce, Mila Kunis NFTs, & Star Wars?

The SEC's crackdown on NFTs is a sign of the agency's increasing focus on the crypto industry. The SEC has long been concerned about the potential for fraud and manipulation in the crypto markets, and NFTs are seen as a new and potentially vulnerable area.


The Stoner Cats case is a significant development, as it is the first time that the SEC has brought enforcement action against an NFT project. The SEC alleged that the Stoner Cats creators sold unregistered securities in the form of NFTs, which gave buyers the right to participate in the development of the animated series and receive other benefits.

The Stoner Cats creators disputed the SEC's allegations, arguing that their project was not a security because it did not involve any promises of profits or investment returns. However, the SEC disagreed, and the Stoner Cats creators ultimately settled with the agency, agreeing to pay a $1 million fine.

The SEC's enforcement action against Stoner Cats has been met with mixed reactions. Some people believe that the SEC is overstepping its authority and stifling innovation in the crypto industry. Others argue that the SEC is right to take action to protect investors from fraud and manipulation.

The SEC's dissenting statement from Peirce and Uyeda reflects the ongoing debate within the agency about how to regulate NFTs. Peirce and Uyeda argue that the Stoner Cats project could be considered fan crowdfunding, which is not subject to SEC regulation.

The SEC's crackdown on NFTs is likely to continue, as the agency seeks to protect investors and ensure that the crypto industry operates fairly and honestly. However, the ongoing debate within the SEC about how to regulate NFTs suggests that the agency may not take a one-size-fits-all approach.

Here are some of the key issues that the SEC is likely to consider when regulating NFTs:

  • Whether NFTs are securities: The SEC has long held that any investment contract that offers profits or investment returns is a security. The agency will need to determine whether NFTs that provide buyers with access to exclusive content, merchandise, or other benefits can be considered securities.

  • Whether NFTs are being used to defraud investors: The SEC is also concerned about the potential for fraud and manipulation in the NFT market. The agency will need to monitor NFT projects for signs of fraud, such as false promises of profits or investment returns.

  • Whether NFTs are being used to evade securities laws: The SEC is also concerned about the potential for NFT projects to be used to evade securities laws. For example, some NFT projects may be structured in a way that allows them to avoid registration with the SEC.

The SEC's regulation of NFTs is still in its early stages, and it is unclear how the agency will ultimately approach this issue. However, the SEC's crackdown on Stoner Cats is a sign that the agency is serious about regulating the NFT market.

It is important to note that the SEC's enforcement action against Stoner Cats does not necessarily mean that all NFT projects are securities. The SEC will need to consider each NFT project on a case-by-case basis to determine whether it meets the definition of a security.

The debate over how to regulate NFTs is likely to continue for some time. However, it is clear that the SEC is taking a close look at this new and emerging asset class.

This episode is sponsored by iTrustCapital

iTrustCapital | Get $100 Funding Reward + No Monthly Fees when you sign up using our custom link! ➜

Become a Diamond Circle Member FREE! ➜
Subscribe on YouTube ✅
Facebook 📱
X/Twitter 📱

Crypto Power Index Beta Access ➜

Looking for the best tax havens for Crypto? Free Month with iTrust Capital - Use PROMO CODE - PAUL BARRON

PBN3’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my deep-dive research, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

PBN3’s Substack
PBN3’s Substack
PBN3 Paul Barron Network